| I spoke with Mike Case and he made the same point as you. The bottom line is, based on the comments by others here and other forums, I plan on buying this probably-the-best-out-there warranty. None the less, it seems a bit of an odd way to write an exclusionary contract - by starting off naming what IS covered. The paragraph states "...will pay...any of the following..." under what is covered. The strange qualifying sentence describing "the only exception[s]" really makes little sense to me. It does not state that hte inclusion list is "not limited to" which is the standard way to stating a list is of examples. As written it implies to me that the exception[s] are to the first list. It goes on in the "not covered" section to list "what is not covered", but makes no reference to the "included" list. As I read it, what is covered is listed in the first section and the second section just clarifies what is definitely excepted - in cases of ambiguity about a part being in the first list. |